🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has announced it is seeking compensation valued at $230 billion against the securities depository Euroclear. This move represents a direct response by the Kremlin against proposals to use frozen Russian sovereign assets to support Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

According to reports in local state media, the central bank filed a claim last week for roughly 18 trillion roubles. This amount is equivalent to the stated $230 billion demand.

EU leaders are set to decide in the coming days on a plan to leverage around €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. This scheme entails granting Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its defence and financial needs.

The vast majority of these funds, amounting to €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution acts as the primary custodian for the Kremlin's immobilised financial reserves.

Divergent Legal Views

European Union authorities have maintained that their proposal is legally sound. Their position rests on the principle that title of the state assets remains with Russia, despite being it was immobilized in European jurisdictions following the full-scale military offensive of Ukraine.

The Russian government, however, has called any utilization of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have warned of reciprocal actions, such as confiscating EU corporate assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has assumed a key position in peace negotiations, stated on X that Russia "will prevail in court" and retrieve its funds. He warned that the EU, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

With statements interpreted as an attempt to drive a wedge between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the proposal as "a vicious assault on the right to ownership and the global financial system established by the United States."

The clearing house declined to provide a statement on the new lawsuit. The institution has in the past stated it is contending with more than 100 legal cases in Russian courts.

Enforcement Challenges

Although judges in EU countries are not expected to enforce judgments from Russian courts, experts expect Moscow to pursue enforcement in countries with closer relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to implement a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other friendly states, if relevant assets can be identified," stated a legal expert from an international firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities said they are developing steps to deter other nations from assisting any Russian legal action against EU entities. Additionally, they are crafting safeguards to protect EU countries with assets in Russia from what they term "unlawful expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the detailed plan, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, using the proceeds earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would remain untouched.

Ukraine would solely be obligated to return the money if and when Russia consented to pay reparations for the vast destruction inflicted during the ongoing war.

Alternative Proposals

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to examine an different approach for funding Ukraine. This entails common EU debt issuance to secure a loan, backed by unused funds within the EU budget.

Such a proposal, nevertheless, demands full agreement among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has already expressed its objection.

Speaking on Monday, the EU top diplomat, a senior official, described the proposed loan scheme as "the strongest option" for supporting Ukraine. "The reparations loan is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, which means it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is equally significant," she remarked. "It also sends a clear message that when you do all this damage to another country, you must pay for the rebuilding."